Anger May Transfer from one person another? ~ Nature

May Anger transfer from one person to another?

"Some negative energy or emotion like anger moves around in nature everywhere in the search of host people."

We all are surrounded by various types of energy in t nature, searching for their host. Those type of energy might be positive or negative.

If we show any negative behavior by doing or thinking any negative work/emotion like anger then it stimulates our body to be the host for that type of energy ( Anger) and our body unknowingly receive more and more energy (anger) from nature and helps us to rise up in peak position.

And if we help that type of negative energy to propagates (flow) in our host body then much more surrounding energy from nature propagates towards our body and we become fatigued, tired due to the disturbance of inner energy working for our body.

We can compare this anger(negative emotion) with a burning candle; if once the flame gets some oxygen to burn then more and more oxygen will be supplied from Nature and the flame does not extinguish until the carbohydrates (food for flame) of the candle not finished.

A similar process occurs for positive energy also even faster than negative energy, the process is Meditation .

fig.1: Anger face

fig.2: Angry child

Fig.3 Release of Anger to the surrounding material.

Anger, also known as wrath or rage, is an intense emotional state involving a strong uncomfortable and non-cooperative response to a perceived provocation hurt, or threat.

A person experiencing Anger will often experience physical effects, such as increased heart rate, elevated blood pressure, and increased levels of adrenaline and noradrenaline

Some view anger as an emotion that triggers the part of the fight or flight response. Anger becomes the predominant feeling behaviorally, cognitively, and physiologically when a person makes the conscious choice to take action to immediately stop the threatening behavior of another outside force.

Anger can have many physical and mental consequences. The external expression of anger can be found in facial expressions, body language, physiological responses, and at times public acts of aggression. Facial expressions can range from inward angling of the eyebrows to a full frown. While most of those who experience anger explain its arousal as a result of "what has happened to them," psychologists point out that an angry person can very well be mistaken because anger causes a loss in self-monitoring capacity and objective observability.

Modern psychologists view anger as a normal, natural, and mature emotion experienced by virtually all humans at times, and as something that has functional value for survival. Uncontrolled anger can, however, negatively affect personal or social well-being. and impact negatively on those around them. While many philosophers and writers have warned against the spontaneous and uncontrolled fits of anger, there has been disagreement over the intrinsic value of anger. The issue of dealing with anger has been written about since the times of the earliest philosophers, but modern psychologists, in contrast to earlier writers, have also pointed out the possible harmful effects of suppressing anger.

"Anger is a really great fuel for creating a sense of justice," said Neo. "So ask yourself, what is the injustice in this? If it's a real injustice what can I do about it?"

 This feeling of “energy”, is not scattered, anxious, or distracted. It is increasing the way you feel, often which is expressed in your emotions.

Sadness, anxiety, anger are all feelings of low “energy”, or low vibration as Suzanne Adams states in her TEDx Talk on Quantum Physics. Who knew we were talking physics when we are looking to intentionally SHIFT our feelings and emotions!

The higher vibrational energies of joy, love, and hope are what the NeuroMindSHIFT techniques SHIFT you to feel.

"If you get down and quarrel every day, you're saying prayers to the devil, I say.”Bob Marley

Neuropsychological perspective

Extension of the Stimuli of the Fighting Reactions. At the beginning of life, the human infant struggles indiscriminately against any restraining force, whether it be another human being or a blanket that confines his movements. There is no inherited susceptibility to social stimuli, as distinct from other stimulation, in anger. At a later date, the child learns that certain actions, such as striking, scolding, and screaming, are effective toward persons, but not toward things. In adults, although the infantile response is still sometimes seen, the fighting reaction becomes fairly well limited to stimuli whose hurting or restraining influence can be thrown off by physical violence.

Causes

Some animals make loud sounds, attempt to look physically larger, bare their teeth, and stare. The behaviors associated with anger are designed to warn aggressors to stop their threatening behavior. Rarely does a physical altercation occur without the prior expression of anger by at least one of the participants? Displays of anger can be used as a manipulation strategy for social influence.

People feel angry when they sense that they or someone they care about has been offended when they are certain about the nature and cause of the angering event, when they are convinced someone else is responsible, and when they feel they can still influence the situation or cope with it. For instance, if a person's car is damaged, they will feel angry if someone else did it (e.g. another driver rear-ended it) but will feel sadness instead if it was caused by situational forces (e.g. a hailstorm) or guilt and shame if they were personally responsible (e.g. he crashed into a wall out of momentary carelessness). Psychotherapist Michael C. Graham defines anger in terms of our expectations and assumptions about the world. Graham states anger almost always results when we are caught up "... expecting the world to be different than it is".

Usually, those who experience anger explain its arousal as a result of "what has happened to them" and in most cases, the described provocations occur immediately before the anger experience. Such explanations confirm the illusion that anger has a discrete external cause. The angry person usually finds the cause of their anger in an intentional, personal, and controllable aspect of another person's behavior. This explanation, however, is based on the intuitions of the angry person who experiences a loss in self-monitoring capacity and objective observability as a result of their emotion. Anger can be of multicausal origin, some of which may be remote events, but people rarely find more than one cause for their anger. According to Novaco, "Anger experiences are embedded or nested within an environmental-temporal context. Disturbances that may not have involved anger at the outset leave residues that are not readily recognized but that operate as a lingering backdrop for focal provocations (of anger). According to Encyclopedia Britannica, an internal infection can cause pain which in turn can activate anger.

Expressive strategies

As with any emotion, the display of anger can be feigned or exaggerated. Studies by Hochschild and Sutton have shown that the show of anger is likely to be an effective manipulation strategy in order to change and design attitudes. Anger is a distinct strategy of social influence and its use (e.g. belligerent behaviors) as a goal achievement mechanism proves to be a successful strategy.

Larissa Tiedens, known for her studies of anger, claimed that expression of feelings would cause a powerful influence not only on the perception of the expresser but also on their power position in the society. She studied the correlation between anger expression and social influence perception. Previous researchers, such as Keating, 1985 have found that people with angry facial expressions were perceived as powerful and as in a high social position. Similarly, Tiedens have revealed that people who compared scenarios involving an angry and a sad character, attributed a higher social status to the angry character. Tiedens examined in her study whether anger expression promotes status attribution. In other words, whether anger contributes to perceptions or legitimization of others' behaviors. Her findings clearly indicated that participants who were exposed to either an angry or a sad person were inclined to express support for the angry person rather than for a sad one. In addition, it was found that a reason for that decision originates from the fact that the person expressing anger was perceived as an ability owner, and was attributed a certain social status accordingly.

Showing anger during a negotiation may increase the ability of the anger expresser to succeed in negotiation. A study by Tiedens et al. indicated that the anger expressers were perceived as stubborn, dominant, and powerful. In addition, it was found that people were inclined to easily give up to those who were perceived by them as powerful and stubborn, rather than soft and submissive. Based on these findings Sinaceur and Tiedens have found that people conceded more to the angry side rather than for the non-angry one.